ABSTRACT According to the resource allocation theory, animals have to make a trade-off between resource-demanding life traits to obtain maximal fitness. Artificial selection toward efficient producing farm animals, however, may have created animals that have an impaired ability to divert resources to maintenance processes, such as responding to immune challenges. Residual feed intake (RFI), defined as the difference between observed feed intake (FI) and expected feed intake based on metabolic BW and growth, was used as a measure for feed efficiency. Individual BW and FI of 352 pullets were recorded weekly from 4 until 14 wk of age to estimate RFI. The top 50 efficient R– and the top 50 nonefficient R+ birds were selected. BW and BW gain in both groups were similar. FI and RFI, however, were significantly higher in R+ birds.
Thirty animals out of every group were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatments: immunization with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH), Mycobacterium butyricum, or heat-inactivated Salmonella enteritidis bacteria. Antibody titers against KLH, M. butyricum, or Salmonella lipopolysaccharide did not differ between R+ and R– birds. The antibody titer against Salmonella protein was higher in R+ birds.
We concluded that a population of chickens from a commercial breed shows considerable variation in RFI. Specific antibody production against KLH, M. butyricum, and S. enteritidis lipopolysaccharide, however, is not influenced by efficiency in terms of RFI. R+ animals may have a higher level of nonantigen specific antibodies, as indicated by the higher antibody response to Salmonella protein.
(Key Words: chicken, immune response, reallocation, residual feed intake)
2004 Poultry Science 83:1602-1609
© 2004 by the Poultry Science Association. All rights reserved.